Perceptric Forum :: The ages of mankind; screen size.

Main Page

Previous:	The digital business divide.
Next:	Pirate Party

The ages of mankind; screen size.

by Richard McKinnon at 02:21PM (EST) on April 6, 2006 | Permanent Link | Cosmos

Small screens aren't a problem to people with good eyes. Would that predominately be kids, teenagers and younger adults? Sure. So why have screens been getting larger in executive offices (ie 19 inches is common now), in home theaters, and on common or garden variety TV's. Well, generally they are slightly older people's purchases. Another example of consumer segmentation unnoticed but driven by age.

Keywords: trend

Technorati Tags: trend

Posted to:

Main Page

Retailing

Comments

Post a comment

No comments found.

Post comment:

Format Type:
	Convert newlines
	Receive comment notifications for this article
Subject:

Comment:

Comment verification:

Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:

You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.

Username:
Password:

If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:

Contact information:

Name:
URL:		example: http://yourdomain.com
Email:

Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.

Perceptric Forum

According to Wikipedia a perceptron is a type of artificial neural network.

Ergo a “Perceptric” is a person who creates or uses a neural network.

The Perceptric Blog is where Chris Gilbey posts thoughts, ideas, and links intended to stimulate thought and accelerate the transfer of ideas.

Chris is available for consulting work with the premise that it is not technologies that are disruptive so much as the people that use them.

The Perceptric mission is to help companies and people reach their goals and exceed their expectations. This will often mean offering counterintuitive conclusions.

Our view? The shortest distance between two points is not necessarily a straight line. It's the number of people needed to be present in a human network to influence and deliver positive decision making.