
China, Globalization, and US
by
Chris Gilbey
on March 23, 2006 07:22AM (EST)
One of the fascinating things about macro economics is that they enable you to see such an interesting view of the near future. Economic policy is both a rear view mirror and a lens with which you can see possible future scenarios, and of course plan accordingly.
That is why I read Stephen Roach's essays and report on them here pretty regularly.
I am also really fascinated by what is happening in the US, since the US economy affects the rest of the world... just as the political structure in Washington does, whether the rest of the world likes it or not.
So this week
Roach reports from Beijing where he has been privy to meetings withe the Chinese central banker, Chairman Ma. Here is one of the quotes from his essay that I find pretty fascinating, and also enormously relevant to the whole issue of convergence that we discuss at Perceptric every day:
He implied that efforts will be made to further expand Chinese imports from the US as well as deal with the all-important concerns over intellectual property rights.
He was emphatic in re-emphasizing the limited role that foreign
exchange policy could play in tempering the US saving shortfall and
related trade imbalance -- in effect, implying no major change in the
RMB exchange rate. At the end of his discourse,
he leaned forward, looked me straight in the eye, and stated with great
emphasis, “You can take this message back to the American people: It is
unfair to make China a scapegoat for structural problems facing the US economy.”
And here is another snip from his essay, this time about a conversation with the Premier:
He implied that efforts will be made to further expand Chinese imports from the US as well as deal with the all-important concerns over intellectual property rights. He was emphatic in re-emphasizing the limited role that foreign exchange policy could play in tempering the US saving shortfall and related trade imbalance -- in effect, implying no major change in the RMB exchange rate. At the end of his discourse, he leaned forward, looked me straight in the eye, and stated with great emphasis, “You can take this message back to the American people: It is unfair to make China a scapegoat for structural problems facing the US economy.”
Taken together what do you get? A very calm and clearly focused China, and a very parochial America (not unsurprising, really - as oneVC I knew in Australia used to say, "You can never go wrong, investing in someone else's self interest" )
So the net net of this story seems to be: China wants to become a beacon of social strength, raising local wages, and increasing buying power, along with improving quality and consuming locally. At the same time it is going to adopt greater transparency with regard to IP laws. The big question is whether it will be able to do all this and keep America happy too.... because China is the source of America's day to day cash. If America introduces tariffs on Chinese goods (whatever they may be dressed up as rhetorically) what will that do to global politics, economics and society generally? Watch this space.