Main Page  »  China
View Article  China Trade Wars
While the popular press focuses on whether the Democrats in the US are going to stop Bush from escalating the war in Iraq, or worse, initiating a war in Iran, are we missing an important piece of the puzzle: China and trade?

Stephen Roach, this week, writes in detail about the parallels between now and the period when the US was Japan-bashing. Interesting to contemplate the issues now with respect to a democratic empowered congress in the US with a large base of support from people whose jobs are disappearing East, because of an order of magnitude savings in production cost. These people used to be working class. Now they are middle class - the consumers of last resort - with growing mortgages and bigger flat panel TV's.

There are other differences between then and now that could also be intensifying the angst of the American worker today.  Back in the late 1980s, the perceived adversary, Japan, was a wealthy developed country that paid its workers wage rates comparable to those in the US.  Today, the fixation is over a poor developing country, China, where manufacturing workers are paid at about 3% the hourly rate of those in America.  Moreover, the competitive pressures of the 1980s were the slow-moving variety bearing down on the manufacturing sector.  Today, courtesy of IT-enabled outsourcing, the threat is intensifying at hyper-speed, while at the same time, spreading from manufacturing to once nontradable services.  In other words, it is really not that difficult to understand why the fear factor of US workers is far more exaggerated today than it was during the late 1980s.

It is these same people who may well find themselves in a double crunch as their jobs disappear at the same time their homes go into negative equity..... at the same time that the dollar starts to crumble too.... see this story from Peter Schiff:

A substantial decline in real estate prices will either produce a severe recession on its own or exacerbate one that arises from other factors. In either case, the result will likely be the Fed coming to the "rescue" with inflationary monetary policy. Inflation will push long-term rates even higher, causing more loans to default. With credit destroyed and home equity and jobs lost, foreign creditors will rush for the exits sending the dollar into a tailspin. The Fed will be forced to buy all of the paper foreign lenders no longer want and that savings-short Americans cannot afford. Domestic money supply will explode sending consumer prices soaring.
View Article  Google Visions
Robert Cringely has an incredibly perceptive insight into the Googleplex and its vision for the future here.

He sees Google building a portfolio of data centres and bandwidth... substantially under the radar of everyone who should be paying attention...  all with an eye on video.

Google is building a LOT of data centers. The company appears to be as attracted to cheap and reliable electric power as it is to population proximity. In Goose Creek they bought those 520 acres from the local state-owned electric utility, which probably answers the land question posed above. By buying out all the remaining building sites in an industrial park owned by an electric utility, Google guarantees itself a vast and uninterruptible supply of power, much as it has done in Oregon by building a data center next to a hydroelectric dam or back here again in Columbia by building near a nuclear power station.

Of course this doesn't answer the question why Google needs so much capacity in the first place, but I have a theory on that. I think Google is building for a future they see but most of the rest of us don't. I'll go further and guess that Google is planning to build similar data centers in many states and that the two centers they are apparently preparing to build here in South Carolina are probably intended mainly to SERVE South Carolina. That's perhaps 100,000 servers for four million potential users or 40 users per server. What computing service could possibly require such resources?

The answer is pretty simple. Google intends to take over most of the functions of existing fixed networks in our lives, notably telephone and cable television.

Video is going to be the future. And the traditional media players are not far behind Google. And the TV station proprieters, the newspaper owners, even radio networks are all in the game too, along with the major telcos. This is a truly high stakes poker game. But I don't think that it will be fought in the US. I believe that the real game for all online media is China. Broadband is rolling out at an incredible rate. China is preparing to stun the world at the Beijing Olympics. They don't have legacy copper network issues to deal with - it is all mobile there....
Keywords: ,
Perceptric Forum

According to Wikipedia a perceptron is a type of artificial neural network.

Ergo a “Perceptric” is a person who creates or uses a neural network.

The Perceptric Blog is where Chris Gilbey posts thoughts, ideas, and links intended to stimulate thought and accelerate the transfer of ideas.

Chris is available for consulting work with the premise that it is not technologies that are disruptive so much as the people that use them.

The Perceptric mission is to help companies and people reach their goals and exceed their expectations. This will often mean offering counterintuitive conclusions.

Our view? The shortest distance between two points is not necessarily a straight line. It's the number of people needed to be present in a human network to influence and deliver positive decision making.

Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Perceptric Presentation
The Perceptric Presentation
Search
Search all blogs
RSS Newsfeeds
Perceptric Forum Main RSS Feed Main Page RSS
China RSS Feed China RSS
Business Blog Top Sites Blogarama - The Blog Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to My Yahoo! Verified Member of the  AttentionTrust